WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Fifth Column 1:42 Sun Jan 8
Re: Liverpool v Wolves F.A Cup Tie
Both decisions were correct according to the Laws Of The game.

For Salah's goal the defender deliberately headed the ball as a result of which a new "phase of play" started meaning Salah wasn't offside because the ball had been played to him by the defender. It is an utterly ridiculous rule but that's how referees have been instructed to interpret the rule.

For the second one, the Wolves player may have been inches offside. It's not possible to tell from the camera angle. The linesman flagged believing he was offside. He may have been onside but it was very very close and even if the linesman was wrong it was by no means a terrible decision from the linesman. VAR didn't have an angle from which to use their technology so VAR didn't get involved. So the lino's decision stands. The only issue here is that I can't understand how VAR didn't have an angle to use. That's poor. But that's not the officials' fault.

So both decisions were correct based on the tech available and based on the laws of the game.

Far Cough 1:26 Sun Jan 8
Re: Liverpool v Wolves F.A Cup Tie
All a bit contrived in favour of Glowing Teeth's team innit?

Iron Duke 1:21 Sun Jan 8
Re: Liverpool v Wolves F.A Cup Tie
Salah was onside because the defender deliberately played the ball. But he was in an offside position when the original ball was played. He gained an obvious advantage. The defender had to play the ball because he was behind him. If that is the rule, then it is bollocks.

The third Wolves goal was disallowed because the corner taker was allegedly offside. But only the linesman saw this. And the linesman was not in line with the last defender. And there were no other camera angles to prove otherwise. In a world class stadium. In 2023.

Far Cough 1:12 Sun Jan 8
Re: Liverpool v Wolves F.A Cup Tie
Salah was a light year offside

Northern Sold 1:09 Sun Jan 8
Re: Liverpool v Wolves F.A Cup Tie
Errrr nope and nope... if those are the correct rules then I just don't get it anymore.... how to complicate a pretty easy rule.... only in Association Football





Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: